The research library

The tests and documents behind what we know about Google, credited to the people who did the work, each graded by how much weight the evidence carries. Every claim on this site links back to an entry here.

How we grade evidence

Strong

Official documentation, sworn testimony, or a large controlled test that others have replicated.

Moderate

A credible test with a real sample and a stated method, but unreplicated or narrow in scope.

Weak

Small sample, correlation only, or a method that leaves obvious alternative explanations open.

Disputed

Credible people read this evidence differently, or later work contradicted it.

32 entries

Weak Feb 2026

Pages with an exact-match internal anchor get about 5x the traffic

Cyrus Shepard, Zyppy

URLs with 0 to 4 internal links averaged about 2 Google clicks; URLs with 40 to 44 internal links got roughly 4 times that, after which the effect reversed past about 45 to 50 links. Pages with at least one exact-match internal anchor had at least 5 times more traffic than pages without one. Anchor text variety correlated with traffic so consistently that Shepard re-ran the analysis three times.

Strong Jan 2026

SEO split testing: the only method that isolates cause

SearchPilot (formerly Distilled ODN)

Published tests include a statistically significant +4.1% organic traffic uplift from removing embedded video carousels on product listing pages, and a mobile-only +14% where desktop showed no significant change.

Moderate Nov 2025

Reddit and Wikipedia lead AI citations, then swing hard

Luke Harsel, Semrush

On ChatGPT, Reddit was cited in close to 60% of responses in early August, then fell to around 10% by mid-September; Wikipedia dropped from roughly 55% to under 20% over the same window. Google AI Mode was steadier, with LinkedIn in nearly 15% of responses and Wikipedia in about 2%. Perplexity leaned on Reddit, LinkedIn and NIH.

Moderate Aug 2025

Only 12% of AI-cited pages rank in Google’s top 10

Louise Linehan and Xibeijia Guan, Ahrefs

On average only 11.9% of pages cited by AI assistants ranked in Google's top 10 for the same question, and about 80% of cited pages did not rank anywhere in Google for that query. Perplexity aligned most closely at 28.6%, while ChatGPT, Gemini and Copilot each sat near 8%.

Strong Jul 2025

AI summaries cut Google link clicks roughly in half

Pew Research Center (Athena Chapekis and colleagues)

About 18% of searches produced an AI summary. When one appeared, users clicked a traditional search result on 8% of visits, versus 15% when none appeared. Just 1% of visits included a click on a source cited inside the summary. Browsing sessions ended on 26% of pages with a summary against 16% without.

Moderate Jul 2025

76% of Google AI Overview citations rank in the top 10

Louise Linehan and Xibeijia Guan, Ahrefs

76.10% of cited pages ranked in Google's top 10 for the same query. 9.50% ranked between positions 11 and 100, and 14.40% ranked beyond position 100. The first cited URL sat at a median organic position of 2.

Disputed Apr 2025

More backlinks correlate with higher Google rankings

Brian Dean, Backlinko

The number 1 result had on average 3.8x more backlinks than the pages ranking in positions 2 to 10. Backlinko also reported that around 95% of all pages have zero backlinks.

Weak Apr 2025

Keyword in the title tag shows almost no ranking correlation

Brian Dean, Backlinko

Backlinko reported essentially zero correlation between using the exact keyword in the title tag and higher rankings. The same study also found zero correlation between site loading speed and rankings.

Moderate Oct 2024

AI Overviews appear almost only for informational queries

Louise Linehan, Ahrefs

99.2% of keywords that trigger an AI Overview have informational intent. AIO keywords have far lower search volume (median 500 versus 29,000) and are longer (median 4 words versus 2). 99.9% of AIO result pages also display at least one other SERP feature.

Moderate May 2024

Leaked API docs show Chrome clickstream feeding Search

Rand Fishkin, SparkToro

The documentation references Chrome-derived clickstream data (e.g. a chrome_trans_clicks field tied to sitelink prominence) and host-level NavBoost evaluation. Fishkin argued this sits awkwardly with Google's repeated public denials that Chrome data influences rankings.

Moderate May 2024

Teardown finds NavBoost click signals in the ranking repository

Mike King, iPullRank

The docs describe NavBoost storing click-based signals (goodClicks, badClicks, lastLongestClicks, unsquashedClicks) with click data normalised to limit manipulation, and a rolling click window. King read this as evidence Google captures and processes click behaviour as a ranking input.

Disputed May 2024

Docs name a siteAuthority field and a hostAge sandbox

Mike King, iPullRank

The documentation stores a compressed siteAuthority quality signal (used within a Q* ranking system) and a hostAge attribute whose stated purpose is to sandbox fresh spam at serving time. King set these against Google's public statements of 'we don't have website authority score' and 'there is no sandbox'.

Weak Dec 2023

96.55% of pages get no organic traffic from Google

Ahrefs

96.55% of the pages studied get zero traffic from Google, and 1.94% get between one and ten monthly visits. Ahrefs links most of this to a lack of backlinks and to search intent mismatch.

Strong Oct 2023

Navboost confirmed under oath: clicks re-rank results

Pandu Nayak (testimony), US Department of Justice (proceedings), Google / US DOJ

Navboost re-ranks results using aggregated click data over a rolling 13-month window, and internal documents describe it as one of Google's strongest signals.

Strong Oct 2023

Under oath, Nayak said RankBrain is too costly to run on all results

Pandu Nayak, US DOJ v. Google

Nayak agreed RankBrain "looks at the top 20 or 30 documents and may adjust their initial score", that it is "certainly more expensive than some of our other ranking components", and that it is "too expensive to run on hundreds or thousands of results". On DeepRank he testified that "training transformer models is more expensive than training straightforward feedforward networks like Google Brain or RankBrain. Those are cheaper to train."

Strong Jan 2023

Google’s crawl budget guide says it only matters for very large sites

Google Search Central

The guide opens: "If your site doesn't have a large number of pages that change rapidly, or if your pages seem to be crawled the same day that they are published, you don't need to read this guide." It targets "Large sites (1 million+ unique pages) with content that changes moderately often (once a week)" and "Medium or larger sites (10,000+ unique pages) with very rapidly changing content (daily)", calling the numbers "a rough estimate" rather than exact thresholds.

Strong Aug 2022

Google calls the helpful content classifier a site-wide signal

Google Search Central

Google described "a new site-wide signal" and stated: "Any content -- not just unhelpful content -- on sites determined to have relatively high amounts of unhelpful content overall is less likely to perform well in Search, assuming there is other content elsewhere from the web that's better to display. For this reason, removing unhelpful content could help the rankings of your other content." It added: "The classifier process is entirely automated, using a machine-learning model."

Moderate Mar 2022

Google rewrites 61.6% of the title tags it shows in search

Cyrus Shepard, Zyppy

Google rewrote 61.6% of titles. Titles of 51 to 60 characters had the lowest rewrite rate (about 39% to 42%); titles over 70 characters were rewritten 99.9% of the time. Titles in [brackets] were rewritten 77.6% of the time versus 61.9% for (parentheses), and Google removed the bracketed text 32.9% of the time. Pipe separators were dropped 41.0% of the time versus 19.7% for dashes.

Moderate Mar 2016

Lipattsev named content and links as Google’s top two signals (2016)

Andrey Lipattsev, Google

Asked to name the top two ranking signals (RankBrain having been publicly confirmed as the third), Lipattsev said the top two are "content and links pointing to your site." This gave the running order as content, links, then RankBrain.